, & Robbins, T. He reveals how the. The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R. The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums. Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty. Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. (). Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top. . In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task. , Antoun, N. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. D. Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al. Roger L. , Aitken, M. function in the control y regulation of human behaviour. Cambridge University Press. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. , b), in which they chose between small/.