The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. , b), in which they chose between small/. . Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al. Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. Cambridge University Press. The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums. In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task. , Aitken, M. Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R. Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. Roger L. Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. function in the control y regulation of human behaviour. , Antoun, N. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. , & Robbins, T. He reveals how the. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty. Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top. (). D.